Indiana Medicaid Expansion May Tempt Other GOP-Led States
By Phil Galewitz
January 28, 2015 - Kaiser Health News
The deal reached Tuesday between the Obama administration and Indiana Gov.
Mike Pence to expand Medicaid under the presidentfs health law should help sway
reluctant Republican officials in other states because it imposes new costs on
poor adults, promotes healthy behaviors and relies on financing from smokers and
hospitals instead of state taxpayers, health experts say.
Pence, a potential GOP presidential candidate in 2016, won a three-year
waiver from the federal government to make Medicaid more like private insurance
by including cost-sharing for recipients below the poverty level.
Under the
agreement, Indiana will pay for its share of the expansion costs beginning
in 2017 with hospital fees and a cigarette tax. gItfs a great talking point,h to
answer opponents who question how states will pay their share of the programfs
costs, said Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown Center for Children
and Families. gThis is really an important feature.h
Then-U.S. Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) speaks during a
rally on Capitol Hill April 2011 in Washington. Pence is now governor of
Indiana. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
The agreement, which will take effect next week, makes Indiana the 28th state
to expand the federal-state insurance program to insure everyone under 138
percent of the federal poverty level, or $16,100 annually for an individual.
About 350,000 Indiana residents are expected to qualify.
Republican lawmakers in Florida, Texas and other states have resisted
expanding the program in part because theyfre against giving non-disabled adults
gfreeh health coverage. They also worry about having to pick up some costs after
2016 when the federal government stops paying the full bill. Federal funding
gradually declines to no less than 90 percent of costs beginning in 2017.
gI think this raises the level of interest in looking at these issues in
states that have not expanded Medicaid,h said Joe Antos, a health economist at
the conservative American Enterprise Institute. gLawmakers in Texas may not be
influenced but there are other states that will want to know more.h
Several states are expected to debate Medicaid expansion this winter and
spring including Florida, Tennessee, Wyoming, Utah and Montana.
But critics of the Indiana deal warn the complexity of the program could make
it harder for poor people to get health care and will require major education to
teach people how to use so-called gPOWER accounts,h modeled on private sector
health savings accounts which the state requires to pay the premiums.
The plan gives poor adults the option
to buy a basic Medicaid plan called Healthy Indiana or the broader Healthy
Indiana Plus, which includes dental and vision benefits and more
comprehensive prescription drug coverage. The Plus plan will require enrollees
to deposit between $3 to $25 a month into their health savings accounts, based
on a sliding scale, although the amount can be reduced if recipients follow some
healthy behaviors, such as quitting smoking or getting an annual checkup.
The fees are optional for those under the federal poverty level but if they
fail to pay, they will be excluded from the Plus plan and have to make nominal
co-payments for care. With limited exceptions, people between 100 percent and
138 percent of the federal poverty level who fail to pay their premiums will be
locked out of Medicaid coverage for six months. Both of these provisions are
unique to Indiana.
Though the original plan had also sought tying coverage to work incentives,
the administration did not approve that.
Georgetownfs Alker said the Indiana deal provides fresh evidence that the
Obama administration will give flexibility to states that agree to expand the
program. Indiana is the fifth state to expand through
a special federal waiver after Arkansas, Iowa, Michigan and
Pennsylvania.
Still, she says the six-month lockout period is gunnecessarily harsh.h
Some consumer advocates also worry the Obama administration made too many
concessions to win the statefs participation.
gIt is worrisome that the Healthy Indiana Plan will charge significant
premiums and penalize some who arenft able to pay by locking them out of
coverage for up to six months,h said Robert Restuccia, executive director of
Community Catalyst in Boston. gA large body of research demonstrates that
premiums and unreasonable cost-sharing requirements impede access to coverage
and needed health care services and can lead to increased medical debt,
especially for low-income people. g
But Grace-Marie Turner, president of the conservative Galen Institute, said
the deal moves Medicaid in the right direction.
gI see it as taking advantage of an opportunity to lay the groundwork for the
kind of Medicaid reform that we must move toward in the future. cBy winning
approval of these changes through a Medicaid waiver, other governors have a much
stronger platform to move toward other changes that will work for their
states.h
States worried about how they will pay for expansion beginning in 2017 when
they have to start paying a percent of the costs also got a boost from the
Indiana strategy. Hospitals in Arizona and Colorado have also agreed to fund
part of state share of Medicaid expansion, and thatfs been proposed in Tennessee
where lawmakers will hold a special session next week on the issue.
Hospitals for decades have contributed money to many states to help support
Medicaid because that money helps draw down more federal funding. Hospitals in
Indiana agreed to pay the money — more than $80 million in 2017 —because they
believe they will make it up by having fewer uninsured patients, said Brian
Tabor, a vice president of the Indiana Hospital Association.
Medicaid has allowed states to charge nominal co-pays to all adults and
premiums for people above the poverty level. Iowa this year began charging a
small premium to some people below the poverty level, but there is no penalty if
they canft or wonft pay it.
Kip Piper, a health care consultant with Sellers Dorsey in Washington D.C.,
said the Indiana agreement is likely a bigger political deal than a major policy
change. gIt shows the Obama administration has moved slightly to allow the state
to test this particular model.h
Pence can now argue he has changed Medicaid and is making beneficiaries more
responsible for their actions, Piper said.
gThis moves the dial ideologically in favor of what the governor wanted,h
Piper said. gIt might invite other states to explore this and other changes that
would make expansion more palatable to legislators.h